mfd: da9063: Rename PMIC_DA9063 to PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063

The PMIC_DA9063 is a complete misnomer, it denotes the value of the
DA9063 chip ID register, so rename it as such. It is also the value
of chip ID register of DA9063L though, so drop the enum as all the
DA9063 "models" share the same chip ID and thus the distinction will
have to be made using DT or otherwise.
Signed-off-by: NMarek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: NSteve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq)
 		dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot read chip model id.\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
-	if (model != PMIC_DA9063) {
+	if (model != PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063) {
 		dev_err(da9063->dev, "Invalid chip model id: 0x%02x\n", model);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}

drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int da9063_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id da9063_i2c_id[] = {
-	{"da9063", PMIC_DA9063},
+	{ "da9063", PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063 },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, da9063_i2c_id);

drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c

@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static struct da9063_dev_model regulators_models[] = {
 	{
 		.regulator_info = da9063_regulator_info,
 		.n_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(da9063_regulator_info),
-		.dev_model = PMIC_DA9063,
+		.dev_model = PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063,
 	},
 	{ }
 };

include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h

@@ -29,9 +29,7 @@
 #define DA9063_DRVNAME_RTC		"da9063-rtc"
 #define DA9063_DRVNAME_VIBRATION	"da9063-vibration"
 
-enum da9063_models {
-	PMIC_DA9063 = 0x61,
-};
+#define PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063		0x61
 
 enum da9063_variant_codes {
 	PMIC_DA9063_AD = 0x3,