提交 d95bc250 编写于 作者: W Will Deacon 提交者: Russell King

ARM: 7839/1: entry: fix tracing of ARM-private syscalls

Commit 377747c4 ("ARM: entry: allow ARM-private syscalls to be
restarted") reworked the low-level syscall dispatcher to allow
restarting of ARM-private syscalls. Unfortunately, this relocated the
label used to dispatch a private syscall from the trace path, so that
the invocation would be bypassed altogether!

This causes applications to fail under strace as soon as they rely on
a private syscall (e.g. set_tls):

  set_tls(0xb6fad4c0, 0xb6fadb98, 0xb6fb1050, 0xb6fad4c0, 0xb6fb1050)
      = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)

This patch fixes the label so that we correctly dispatch private
syscalls from the trace path.
Reported-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Tested-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
上级 c89efa73
...@@ -442,10 +442,10 @@ local_restart: ...@@ -442,10 +442,10 @@ local_restart:
ldrcc pc, [tbl, scno, lsl #2] @ call sys_* routine ldrcc pc, [tbl, scno, lsl #2] @ call sys_* routine
add r1, sp, #S_OFF add r1, sp, #S_OFF
cmp scno, #(__ARM_NR_BASE - __NR_SYSCALL_BASE) 2: cmp scno, #(__ARM_NR_BASE - __NR_SYSCALL_BASE)
eor r0, scno, #__NR_SYSCALL_BASE @ put OS number back eor r0, scno, #__NR_SYSCALL_BASE @ put OS number back
bcs arm_syscall bcs arm_syscall
2: mov why, #0 @ no longer a real syscall mov why, #0 @ no longer a real syscall
b sys_ni_syscall @ not private func b sys_ni_syscall @ not private func
#if defined(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT) || !defined(CONFIG_AEABI) #if defined(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT) || !defined(CONFIG_AEABI)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册