提交 d77a117e 编写于 作者: D Dan Williams 提交者: Linus Torvalds

list: kill list_force_poison()

Given we have uninitialized list_heads being passed to list_add() it
will always be the case that those uninitialized values randomly trigger
the poison value.  Especially since a list_add() operation will seed the
stack with the poison value for later stack allocations to trip over.

For example, see these two false positive reports:

  list_add attempted on force-poisoned entry
  WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:34
  [..]
  NIP [c00000000043c390] __list_add+0xb0/0x150
  LR [c00000000043c38c] __list_add+0xac/0x150
  Call Trace:
    __list_add+0xac/0x150 (unreliable)
    __down+0x4c/0xf8
    down+0x68/0x70
    xfs_buf_lock+0x4c/0x150 [xfs]

  list_add attempted on force-poisoned entry(0000000000000500),
   new->next == d0000000059ecdb0, new->prev == 0000000000000500
  WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:33
  [..]
  NIP [c00000000042db78] __list_add+0xa8/0x140
  LR [c00000000042db74] __list_add+0xa4/0x140
  Call Trace:
    __list_add+0xa4/0x140 (unreliable)
    rwsem_down_read_failed+0x6c/0x1a0
    down_read+0x58/0x60
    xfs_log_commit_cil+0x7c/0x600 [xfs]

Fixes: commit 5c2c2587 ("mm, dax, pmem: introduce {get|put}_dev_pagemap() for dax-gup")
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reported-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 06b241f3
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -113,17 +113,6 @@ extern void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry);
extern void list_del(struct list_head *entry);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
/*
* See devm_memremap_pages() which wants DEBUG_LIST=y to assert if one
* of the pages it allocates is ever passed to list_add()
*/
extern void list_force_poison(struct list_head *entry);
#else
/* fallback to the less strict LIST_POISON* definitions */
#define list_force_poison list_del
#endif
/**
* list_replace - replace old entry by new one
* @old : the element to be replaced
......
......@@ -351,8 +351,13 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
for_each_device_pfn(pfn, page_map) {
struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
/* ZONE_DEVICE pages must never appear on a slab lru */
list_force_poison(&page->lru);
/*
* ZONE_DEVICE pages union ->lru with a ->pgmap back
* pointer. It is a bug if a ZONE_DEVICE page is ever
* freed or placed on a driver-private list. Seed the
* storage with LIST_POISON* values.
*/
list_del(&page->lru);
page->pgmap = pgmap;
}
devres_add(dev, page_map);
......
......@@ -12,13 +12,6 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
static struct list_head force_poison;
void list_force_poison(struct list_head *entry)
{
entry->next = &force_poison;
entry->prev = &force_poison;
}
/*
* Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
*
......@@ -30,8 +23,6 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
WARN(new->next == &force_poison || new->prev == &force_poison,
"list_add attempted on force-poisoned entry\n");
WARN(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部