提交 d7514012 编写于 作者: W Wey-Yi Guy

iwlwifi: Sanity check for sta_id

On my testing, I saw some strange behavior

[  421.739708] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: ACTIVATE a non DRIVER active station id 148 addr 00:00:00:00:00:00
[  421.739719] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: iwl_sta_ucode_activate Added STA id 148 addr 00:00:00:00:00:00 to uCode

not sure how it happen, but adding the sanity check to prevent memory
corruption
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
上级 64eeacb7
......@@ -35,9 +35,12 @@
#include "iwl-trans.h"
/* priv->shrd->sta_lock must be held */
static void iwl_sta_ucode_activate(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 sta_id)
static int iwl_sta_ucode_activate(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 sta_id)
{
if (sta_id >= IWLAGN_STATION_COUNT) {
IWL_ERR(priv, "invalid sta_id %u", sta_id);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (!(priv->stations[sta_id].used & IWL_STA_DRIVER_ACTIVE))
IWL_ERR(priv, "ACTIVATE a non DRIVER active station id %u "
"addr %pM\n",
......@@ -53,6 +56,7 @@ static void iwl_sta_ucode_activate(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 sta_id)
IWL_DEBUG_ASSOC(priv, "Added STA id %u addr %pM to uCode\n",
sta_id, priv->stations[sta_id].sta.sta.addr);
}
return 0;
}
static int iwl_process_add_sta_resp(struct iwl_priv *priv,
......@@ -77,8 +81,7 @@ static int iwl_process_add_sta_resp(struct iwl_priv *priv,
switch (pkt->u.add_sta.status) {
case ADD_STA_SUCCESS_MSK:
IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "REPLY_ADD_STA PASSED\n");
iwl_sta_ucode_activate(priv, sta_id);
ret = 0;
ret = iwl_sta_ucode_activate(priv, sta_id);
break;
case ADD_STA_NO_ROOM_IN_TABLE:
IWL_ERR(priv, "Adding station %d failed, no room in table.\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册