提交 d71f11c0 编写于 作者: K Kan Liang 提交者: Ingo Molnar

perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check for NHM

For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 2da33146
......@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void nhmex_uncore_msr_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct p
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
if (hwc->idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
if (hwc->idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT0);
else if (box->pmu->type->event_mask & NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT0)
wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config | NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT22);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册