提交 d4e0bfec 编写于 作者: D David Teigland 提交者: Steven Whitehouse

GFS2: fix skip unlock condition

The recent commit fb6791d1
included the wrong logic.  The lvbptr check was incorrectly
added after the patch was tested.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
上级 949db153
......@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
{
struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_sbd;
struct lm_lockstruct *ls = &sdp->sd_lockstruct;
int lvb_needs_unlock = 0;
int error;
if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lkid == 0) {
......@@ -294,8 +295,12 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
gfs2_update_request_times(gl);
/* don't want to skip dlm_unlock writing the lvb when lock is ex */
if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE))
lvb_needs_unlock = 1;
if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) {
!lvb_needs_unlock) {
gfs2_glock_free(gl);
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册