提交 d0208639 编写于 作者: H Heiko Carstens 提交者: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/dumpstack: restore reliable indicator for call traces

Before merging all different stack tracers the call traces printed had
an indicator if an entry can be considered reliable or not.
Unreliable entries were put in braces, reliable not. Currently all
lines contain these extra braces.

This patch restores the old behaviour by adding an extra "reliable"
parameter to the callback functions. Only show_trace makes currently
use of it.

Before:
[    0.804751] Call Trace:
[    0.804753] ([<000000000017d0e0>] try_to_wake_up+0x318/0x5e0)
[    0.804756] ([<0000000000161d64>] create_worker+0x174/0x1c0)

After:
[    0.804751] Call Trace:
[    0.804753] ([<000000000017d0e0>] try_to_wake_up+0x318/0x5e0)
[    0.804756]  [<0000000000161d64>] create_worker+0x174/0x1c0

Fixes: 758d39eb ("s390/dumpstack: merge all four stack tracers")
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
上级 b5003b5f
......@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ struct task_struct;
struct mm_struct;
struct seq_file;
typedef int (*dump_trace_func_t)(void *data, unsigned long address);
typedef int (*dump_trace_func_t)(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable);
void dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data,
struct task_struct *task, unsigned long sp);
......
......@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ __dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, unsigned long sp,
if (sp < low || sp > high - sizeof(*sf))
return sp;
sf = (struct stack_frame *) sp;
if (func(data, sf->gprs[8], 0))
return sp;
/* Follow the backchain. */
while (1) {
if (func(data, sf->gprs[8]))
return sp;
low = sp;
sp = sf->back_chain;
if (!sp)
......@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ __dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, unsigned long sp,
if (sp <= low || sp > high - sizeof(*sf))
return sp;
sf = (struct stack_frame *) sp;
if (func(data, sf->gprs[8], 1))
return sp;
}
/* Zero backchain detected, check for interrupt frame. */
sp = (unsigned long) (sf + 1);
......@@ -56,7 +58,7 @@ __dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, unsigned long sp,
return sp;
regs = (struct pt_regs *) sp;
if (!user_mode(regs)) {
if (func(data, regs->psw.addr))
if (func(data, regs->psw.addr, 1))
return sp;
}
low = sp;
......@@ -90,7 +92,7 @@ struct return_address_data {
int depth;
};
static int __return_address(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int __return_address(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
struct return_address_data *rd = data;
......@@ -109,9 +111,12 @@ unsigned long return_address(int depth)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
static int show_address(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int show_address(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
printk("([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n", address, (void *)address);
if (reliable)
printk(" [<%016lx>] %pSR \n", address, (void *)address);
else
printk("([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n", address, (void *)address);
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int __init service_level_perf_register(void)
}
arch_initcall(service_level_perf_register);
static int __perf_callchain_kernel(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int __perf_callchain_kernel(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry = data;
......
......@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static int __save_address(void *data, unsigned long address, int nosched)
return 1;
}
static int save_address(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int save_address(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
return __save_address(data, address, 0);
}
static int save_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int save_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
return __save_address(data, address, 1);
}
......
......@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
static int __s390_backtrace(void *data, unsigned long address)
static int __s390_backtrace(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
unsigned int *depth = data;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册