s390/uaccess: normalize order of parameters of indirect uaccess function calls
For some unknown reason the indirect uaccess functions on s390 implement a different parameter order than what is usual. e.g.: unsigned long copy_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long n); vs. size_t (*copy_to_user)(size_t n, void __user * to, const void *from); Let's get rid of this confusing parameter reordering. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录