提交 cc967be5 编写于 作者: J Julia Lawall 提交者: Al Viro

fs: Add missing mutex_unlock

Add a mutex_unlock missing on the error path.  At other exists from the
function that return an error flag, the mutex is unlocked, so do the same
here.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@

* mutex_lock(E1,...);
  <+... when != E1
  if (...) {
    ... when != E1
*   return ...;
  }
  ...+>
* mutex_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 ea635c64
......@@ -1169,14 +1169,18 @@ long pipe_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
switch (cmd) {
case F_SETPIPE_SZ:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && arg > pipe_max_pages)
return -EINVAL;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && arg > pipe_max_pages) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
/*
* The pipe needs to be at least 2 pages large to
* guarantee POSIX behaviour.
*/
if (arg < 2)
return -EINVAL;
if (arg < 2) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
ret = pipe_set_size(pipe, arg);
break;
case F_GETPIPE_SZ:
......@@ -1187,6 +1191,7 @@ long pipe_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
break;
}
out:
mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册