mm, oom_reaper: do not use siglock in try_oom_reaper()

Oleg has noted that siglock usage in try_oom_reaper is both pointless
and dangerous.  signal_group_exit can be checked lockless.  The problem
is that sighand becomes NULL in __exit_signal so we can crash.

Fixes: 3ef22dff ("oom, oom_reaper: try to reap tasks which skip regular OOM killer path")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464679423-30218-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/oom_kill.c

@@ -625,8 +625,6 @@ void try_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1) {
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		for_each_process(p) {
-			bool exiting;
-
 			if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
 				continue;
 			if (fatal_signal_pending(p))
@@ -636,10 +634,7 @@ void try_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
 			 * If the task is exiting make sure the whole thread group
 			 * is exiting and cannot acces mm anymore.
 			 */
-			spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
-			exiting = signal_group_exit(p->signal);
-			spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
-			if (exiting)
+			if (signal_group_exit(p->signal))
 				continue;
 
 			/* Give up */