提交 cb969f07 编写于 作者: V Venkat Yekkirala 提交者: David S. Miller

[MLSXFRM]: Default labeling of socket specific IPSec policies

This defaults the label of socket-specific IPSec policies to be the
same as the socket they are set on.
Signed-off-by: NVenkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 beb8d13b
......@@ -827,8 +827,10 @@ struct swap_info_struct;
* used by the XFRM system.
* @sec_ctx contains the security context information being provided by
* the user-level policy update program (e.g., setkey).
* @sk refers to the sock from which to derive the security context.
* Allocate a security structure to the xp->security field; the security
* field is initialized to NULL when the xfrm_policy is allocated.
* field is initialized to NULL when the xfrm_policy is allocated. Only
* one of sec_ctx or sock can be specified.
* Return 0 if operation was successful (memory to allocate, legal context)
* @xfrm_policy_clone_security:
* @old contains an existing xfrm_policy in the SPD.
......@@ -1359,7 +1361,8 @@ struct security_operations {
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
int (*xfrm_policy_alloc_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
int (*xfrm_policy_alloc_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp,
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx, struct sock *sk);
int (*xfrm_policy_clone_security) (struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new);
void (*xfrm_policy_free_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int (*xfrm_policy_delete_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp);
......@@ -3057,7 +3060,12 @@ static inline void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx)
{
return security_ops->xfrm_policy_alloc_security(xp, sec_ctx);
return security_ops->xfrm_policy_alloc_security(xp, sec_ctx, NULL);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_sock_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct sock *sk)
{
return security_ops->xfrm_policy_alloc_security(xp, NULL, sk);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new)
......@@ -3132,6 +3140,11 @@ static inline int security_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm
return 0;
}
static inline int security_xfrm_sock_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct sock *sk)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new)
{
return 0;
......
......@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ struct xfrm_mgr
char *id;
int (*notify)(struct xfrm_state *x, struct km_event *c);
int (*acquire)(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *, struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir);
struct xfrm_policy *(*compile_policy)(u16 family, int opt, u8 *data, int len, int *dir);
struct xfrm_policy *(*compile_policy)(struct sock *sk, int opt, u8 *data, int len, int *dir);
int (*new_mapping)(struct xfrm_state *x, xfrm_address_t *ipaddr, u16 sport);
int (*notify_policy)(struct xfrm_policy *x, int dir, struct km_event *c);
};
......
......@@ -2843,14 +2843,14 @@ static int pfkey_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *t, struct
return pfkey_broadcast(skb, GFP_ATOMIC, BROADCAST_REGISTERED, NULL);
}
static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
u8 *data, int len, int *dir)
{
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
struct sadb_x_policy *pol = (struct sadb_x_policy*)data;
struct sadb_x_sec_ctx *sec_ctx;
switch (family) {
switch (sk->sk_family) {
case AF_INET:
if (opt != IP_IPSEC_POLICY) {
*dir = -EOPNOTSUPP;
......@@ -2891,7 +2891,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
xp->lft.hard_byte_limit = XFRM_INF;
xp->lft.soft_packet_limit = XFRM_INF;
xp->lft.hard_packet_limit = XFRM_INF;
xp->family = family;
xp->family = sk->sk_family;
xp->xfrm_nr = 0;
if (pol->sadb_x_policy_type == IPSEC_POLICY_IPSEC &&
......@@ -2907,8 +2907,10 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
p += pol->sadb_x_policy_len*8;
sec_ctx = (struct sadb_x_sec_ctx *)p;
if (len < pol->sadb_x_policy_len*8 +
sec_ctx->sadb_x_sec_len)
sec_ctx->sadb_x_sec_len) {
*dir = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
if ((*dir = verify_sec_ctx_len(p)))
goto out;
uctx = pfkey_sadb2xfrm_user_sec_ctx(sec_ctx);
......@@ -2918,6 +2920,11 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
if (*dir)
goto out;
}
else {
*dir = security_xfrm_sock_policy_alloc(xp, sk);
if (*dir)
goto out;
}
*dir = pol->sadb_x_policy_dir-1;
return xp;
......
......@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname, u8 __user *optval, int optlen
err = -EINVAL;
read_lock(&xfrm_km_lock);
list_for_each_entry(km, &xfrm_km_list, list) {
pol = km->compile_policy(sk->sk_family, optname, data,
pol = km->compile_policy(sk, optname, data,
optlen, &err);
if (err >= 0)
break;
......
......@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *xt,
/* User gives us xfrm_user_policy_info followed by an array of 0
* or more templates.
*/
static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
u8 *data, int len, int *dir)
{
struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *p = (struct xfrm_userpolicy_info *)data;
......@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
struct xfrm_policy *xp;
int nr;
switch (family) {
switch (sk->sk_family) {
case AF_INET:
if (opt != IP_XFRM_POLICY) {
*dir = -EOPNOTSUPP;
......@@ -1807,6 +1807,15 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(u16 family, int opt,
copy_from_user_policy(xp, p);
copy_templates(xp, ut, nr);
if (!xp->security) {
int err = security_xfrm_sock_policy_alloc(xp, sk);
if (err) {
kfree(xp);
*dir = err;
return NULL;
}
}
*dir = p->dir;
return xp;
......
......@@ -815,7 +815,8 @@ static inline void dummy_sk_getsecid(struct sock *sk, u32 *secid)
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
static int dummy_xfrm_policy_alloc_security(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx)
static int dummy_xfrm_policy_alloc_security(struct xfrm_policy *xp,
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx, struct sock *sk)
{
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
#ifndef _SELINUX_XFRM_H_
#define _SELINUX_XFRM_H_
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp,
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx, struct sock *sk);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new);
void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp);
......
......@@ -208,10 +208,8 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
BUG_ON(uctx && pol);
if (pol)
goto from_policy;
BUG_ON(!uctx);
if (!uctx)
goto not_from_user;
if (uctx->ctx_doi != XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX)
return -EINVAL;
......@@ -251,11 +249,14 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
return rc;
from_policy:
BUG_ON(!pol);
rc = security_sid_mls_copy(pol->ctx_sid, sid, &ctx_sid);
if (rc)
goto out;
not_from_user:
if (pol) {
rc = security_sid_mls_copy(pol->ctx_sid, sid, &ctx_sid);
if (rc)
goto out;
}
else
ctx_sid = sid;
rc = security_sid_to_context(ctx_sid, &ctx_str, &str_len);
if (rc)
......@@ -293,13 +294,23 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
* LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers uctx spec to
* xfrm_policy.
*/
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx)
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp,
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx, struct sock *sk)
{
int err;
u32 sid;
BUG_ON(!xp);
BUG_ON(uctx && sk);
if (sk) {
struct sk_security_struct *ssec = sk->sk_security;
sid = ssec->sid;
}
else
sid = SECSID_NULL;
err = selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(&xp->security, uctx, NULL, 0);
err = selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(&xp->security, uctx, NULL, sid);
return err;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册