提交 cb2e343d 编写于 作者: F Florian Westphal 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nft_compat: destroy function must not have side effects

The nft_compat destroy function deletes the nft_xt object from a list.
This isn't allowed anymore. Destroy functions are called asynchronously,
i.e. next batch can find the object that has a pending ->destroy()
invocation:

cpu0                       cpu1
 worker
   ->destroy               for_each_entry()
	                     if (x == ...
			        return x->ops;
     list_del(x)
     kfree_rcu(x)
                           expr->ops->... // ops was free'd

To resolve this, the list_del needs to occur before the transaction
mutex gets released.  nf_tables has a 'deactivate' hook for this
purpose, so use that to unlink the object from the list.

Fixes: 0935d5588400 ("netfilter: nf_tables: asynchronous release")
Reported-by: NTaehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
上级 3dbba8eb
......@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ struct nft_xt {
struct nft_expr_ops ops;
refcount_t refcnt;
/* used only when transaction mutex is locked */
unsigned int listcnt;
/* Unlike other expressions, ops doesn't have static storage duration.
* nft core assumes they do. We use kfree_rcu so that nft core can
* can check expr->ops->size even after nft_compat->destroy() frees
......@@ -61,7 +64,7 @@ static struct nft_compat_net *nft_compat_pernet(struct net *net)
static bool nft_xt_put(struct nft_xt *xt)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&xt->refcnt)) {
list_del(&xt->head);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&xt->head));
kfree_rcu(xt, rcu_head);
return true;
}
......@@ -537,6 +540,43 @@ nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
__nft_match_destroy(ctx, expr, nft_expr_priv(expr));
}
static void nft_compat_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr,
struct list_head *h)
{
struct nft_xt *xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
if (xt->listcnt == 0)
list_add(&xt->head, h);
xt->listcnt++;
}
static void nft_compat_activate_mt(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
struct nft_compat_net *cn = nft_compat_pernet(ctx->net);
nft_compat_activate(ctx, expr, &cn->nft_match_list);
}
static void nft_compat_activate_tg(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
struct nft_compat_net *cn = nft_compat_pernet(ctx->net);
nft_compat_activate(ctx, expr, &cn->nft_target_list);
}
static void nft_compat_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
struct nft_xt *xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
if (--xt->listcnt == 0)
list_del_init(&xt->head);
}
static void
nft_match_large_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
......@@ -789,6 +829,8 @@ nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
nft_match->ops.eval = nft_match_eval;
nft_match->ops.init = nft_match_init;
nft_match->ops.destroy = nft_match_destroy;
nft_match->ops.activate = nft_compat_activate_mt;
nft_match->ops.deactivate = nft_compat_deactivate;
nft_match->ops.dump = nft_match_dump;
nft_match->ops.validate = nft_match_validate;
nft_match->ops.data = match;
......@@ -805,6 +847,7 @@ nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
nft_match->ops.size = matchsize;
nft_match->listcnt = 1;
list_add(&nft_match->head, &cn->nft_match_list);
return &nft_match->ops;
......@@ -891,6 +934,8 @@ nft_target_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
nft_target->ops.size = NFT_EXPR_SIZE(XT_ALIGN(target->targetsize));
nft_target->ops.init = nft_target_init;
nft_target->ops.destroy = nft_target_destroy;
nft_target->ops.activate = nft_compat_activate_tg;
nft_target->ops.deactivate = nft_compat_deactivate;
nft_target->ops.dump = nft_target_dump;
nft_target->ops.validate = nft_target_validate;
nft_target->ops.data = target;
......@@ -900,6 +945,7 @@ nft_target_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
else
nft_target->ops.eval = nft_target_eval_xt;
nft_target->listcnt = 1;
list_add(&nft_target->head, &cn->nft_target_list);
return &nft_target->ops;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册