net: sfp: add mutex to prevent concurrent state checks

[ Upstream commit 2158e856f56bb762ef90f3ec244d41a519826f75 ]

sfp_check_state can potentially be called by both a threaded IRQ handler
and delayed work. If it is concurrently called, it could result in
incorrect state management. Add a st_mutex to protect the state - this
lock gets taken outside of code that checks and handle state changes, and
the existing sm_mutex nests inside of it.
Suggested-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NRobert Hancock <hancock@sedsystems.ca>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

drivers/net/phy/sfp.c

@@ -185,10 +185,11 @@ struct sfp {
 	struct gpio_desc *gpio[GPIO_MAX];
 
 	bool attached;
+	struct mutex st_mutex;			/* Protects state */
 	unsigned int state;
 	struct delayed_work poll;
 	struct delayed_work timeout;
-	struct mutex sm_mutex;
+	struct mutex sm_mutex;			/* Protects state machine */
 	unsigned char sm_mod_state;
 	unsigned char sm_dev_state;
 	unsigned short sm_state;
@@ -1718,6 +1719,7 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
 {
 	unsigned int state, i, changed;
 
+	mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	state = sfp_get_state(sfp);
 	changed = state ^ sfp->state;
 	changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
@@ -1743,6 +1745,7 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
 		sfp_sm_event(sfp, state & SFP_F_LOS ?
 				SFP_E_LOS_HIGH : SFP_E_LOS_LOW);
 	rtnl_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t sfp_irq(int irq, void *data)
@@ -1773,6 +1776,7 @@ static struct sfp *sfp_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	sfp->dev = dev;
 
 	mutex_init(&sfp->sm_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sfp->poll, sfp_poll);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sfp->timeout, sfp_timeout);