提交 c41d9663 编写于 作者: G Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "scsi: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback()"

This reverts commit de1dee78.

Tejun writes:
        I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
        get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
        to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
        something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
        with the remove_self() like everybody else.  IOW, I think the
        first posting was correct.

Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
上级 ff483d55
......@@ -635,12 +635,23 @@ store_rescan_field (struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, S_IWUSR, NULL, store_rescan_field);
static void sdev_store_delete_callback(struct device *dev)
{
scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
}
static ssize_t
sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
int rc;
/* An attribute cannot be unregistered by one of its own methods,
* so we have to use this roundabout approach.
*/
rc = device_schedule_callback(dev, sdev_store_delete_callback);
if (rc)
count = rc;
return count;
};
static DEVICE_ATTR(delete, S_IWUSR, NULL, sdev_store_delete);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册