mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" loop

Purely cosmetic, but the complex "if" condition looks annoying to me.
Especially because it is not consistent with OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN check
which adds another if/continue.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NHillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Kyle Walker <kwalker@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislav Kozina <skozina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/oom_kill.c

@@ -574,14 +574,18 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
 	 * pending fatal signal.
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(p)
-		if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
-		    !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
-			if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
-				continue;
+	for_each_process(p) {
+		if (p->mm != mm)
+			continue;
+		if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
+			continue;
+		if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+			continue;
+		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
+			continue;
 
-			do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
-		}
+		do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
+	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	mmdrop(mm);