提交 c227390c 编写于 作者: D Dave Kleikamp 提交者: Linus Torvalds

jfs should use MAX_LFS_FILESIZE when calculating s_maxbytes

jfs had previously avoided the use of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE because it hadn't
accounted for the whole 32-bit index range on 32-bit systems.  That has
been fixed by commit 0cc3b0ec ("Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE
macros"), so we can simplify the code now.

Suggested by Andreas Dilger.
Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 42ff72cf
......@@ -619,16 +619,10 @@ static int jfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
if (!sb->s_root)
goto out_no_root;
/* logical blocks are represented by 40 bits in pxd_t, etc. */
sb->s_maxbytes = ((u64) sb->s_blocksize) << 40;
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
/*
* Page cache is indexed by long.
* I would use MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, but it's only half as big
/* logical blocks are represented by 40 bits in pxd_t, etc.
* and page cache is indexed by long
*/
sb->s_maxbytes = min(((u64) PAGE_SIZE << 32) - 1,
(u64)sb->s_maxbytes);
#endif
sb->s_maxbytes = min(((loff_t)sb->s_blocksize) << 40, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE);
sb->s_time_gran = 1;
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册