提交 bc2ae0f5 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo

workqueue: drop @bind from create_worker()

Currently, create_worker()'s callers are responsible for deciding
whether the newly created worker should be bound to the associated CPU
and create_worker() sets WORKER_UNBOUND only for the workers for the
unbound global_cwq.  Creation during normal operation is always via
maybe_create_worker() and @bind is true.  For workers created during
hotplug, @bind is false.

Normal operation path is planned to be used even while the CPU is
going through hotplug operations or offline and this static decision
won't work.

Drop @bind from create_worker() and decide whether to bind by looking
at GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED.  create_worker() will also set WORKER_UNBOUND
autmatically if disassociated.  To avoid flipping GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED
while create_worker() is in progress, the flag is now allowed to be
changed only while holding all manager_mutexes on the global_cwq.

This requires that GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED is not cleared behind trustee's
back.  CPU_ONLINE no longer clears DISASSOCIATED before flushing
trustee, which clears DISASSOCIATED before rebinding remaining workers
if asked to release.  For cases where trustee isn't around, CPU_ONLINE
clears DISASSOCIATED after flushing trustee.  Also, now, first_idle
has UNBOUND set on creation which is explicitly cleared by CPU_ONLINE
while binding it.  These convolutions will soon be removed by further
simplification of CPU hotplug path.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
上级 60373152
......@@ -45,7 +45,22 @@
#include "workqueue_sched.h"
enum {
/* global_cwq flags */
/*
* global_cwq flags
*
* A bound gcwq is either associated or disassociated with its CPU.
* While associated (!DISASSOCIATED), all workers are bound to the
* CPU and none has %WORKER_UNBOUND set and concurrency management
* is in effect.
*
* While DISASSOCIATED, the cpu may be offline and all workers have
* %WORKER_UNBOUND set and concurrency management disabled, and may
* be executing on any CPU. The gcwq behaves as an unbound one.
*
* Note that DISASSOCIATED can be flipped only while holding
* managership of all pools on the gcwq to avoid changing binding
* state while create_worker() is in progress.
*/
GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 0, /* cpu can't serve workers */
GCWQ_FREEZING = 1 << 1, /* freeze in progress */
......@@ -1334,7 +1349,6 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
/**
* create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
* @pool: pool the new worker will belong to
* @bind: whether to set affinity to @cpu or not
*
* Create a new worker which is bound to @pool. The returned worker
* can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using
......@@ -1346,10 +1360,9 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
* RETURNS:
* Pointer to the newly created worker.
*/
static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind)
static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
struct global_cwq *gcwq = pool->gcwq;
bool on_unbound_cpu = gcwq->cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
const char *pri = worker_pool_pri(pool) ? "H" : "";
struct worker *worker = NULL;
int id = -1;
......@@ -1370,7 +1383,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind)
worker->pool = pool;
worker->id = id;
if (!on_unbound_cpu)
if (gcwq->cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
worker->task = kthread_create_on_node(worker_thread,
worker, cpu_to_node(gcwq->cpu),
"kworker/%u:%d%s", gcwq->cpu, id, pri);
......@@ -1384,15 +1397,19 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool, bool bind)
set_user_nice(worker->task, HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL);
/*
* An unbound worker will become a regular one if CPU comes online
* later on. Make sure every worker has PF_THREAD_BOUND set.
* Determine CPU binding of the new worker depending on
* %GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED. The caller is responsible for ensuring the
* flag remains stable across this function. See the comments
* above the flag definition for details.
*
* As an unbound worker may later become a regular one if CPU comes
* online, make sure every worker has %PF_THREAD_BOUND set.
*/
if (bind && !on_unbound_cpu)
if (!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED)) {
kthread_bind(worker->task, gcwq->cpu);
else {
} else {
worker->task->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
if (on_unbound_cpu)
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
}
return worker;
......@@ -1568,7 +1585,7 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
while (true) {
struct worker *worker;
worker = create_worker(pool, true);
worker = create_worker(pool);
if (worker) {
del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
......@@ -3420,12 +3437,10 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq)
if (need_to_create_worker(pool)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
worker = create_worker(pool, false);
worker = create_worker(pool);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
if (worker) {
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
if (worker)
start_worker(worker);
}
}
}
......@@ -3463,6 +3478,10 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq)
for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq)
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pool->idle_list));
/* if we're reassociating, clear DISASSOCIATED */
if (gcwq->trustee_state == TRUSTEE_RELEASE)
gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
struct work_struct *rebind_work = &worker->rebind_work;
......@@ -3546,7 +3565,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
i = 0;
for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
BUG_ON(pool->first_idle);
new_workers[i] = create_worker(pool, false);
new_workers[i] = create_worker(pool);
if (!new_workers[i++])
goto err_destroy;
}
......@@ -3584,13 +3603,19 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_ONLINE:
gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
if (gcwq->trustee_state != TRUSTEE_DONE) {
gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_RELEASE;
wake_up_process(gcwq->trustee);
wait_trustee_state(gcwq, TRUSTEE_DONE);
}
/*
* Either DISASSOCIATED is already cleared or no worker is
* left on the gcwq. Safe to clear DISASSOCIATED without
* claiming managers.
*/
gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
/*
* Trustee is done and there might be no worker left.
* Put the first_idle in and request a real manager to
......@@ -3601,6 +3626,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
kthread_bind(pool->first_idle->task, cpu);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS;
pool->first_idle->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
start_worker(pool->first_idle);
pool->first_idle = NULL;
}
......@@ -3899,7 +3925,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
struct worker *worker;
worker = create_worker(pool, true);
worker = create_worker(pool);
BUG_ON(!worker);
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
start_worker(worker);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册