perf bench: Fix failing assertions in numa bench

Patch adds more subtle handling of -C and -N parameters in
parse_{cpu,node}_setup_list() functions when there isn't enough NUMA
nodes or CPUs present.  Instead of assertion and terminating benchmark,
partial test is skipped with error message and perf will continue to the
next one.

Fixed problem can be easily reproduced on machine with only one NUMA
node:

 # Running numa/mem benchmark...

  # Running main, "perf bench numa mem -a"

...

 # Running RAM-bw-remote, "perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0 -M 1 -s
perf: bench/numa.c:622: parse_setup_node_list: Assertion `!(bind_node_0 < 0 ||
		bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes)' failed.
Aborted
Signed-off-by: NPetr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Petr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1380821325-4017-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NPetr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools/perf/bench/numa.c

@@ -429,14 +429,14 @@ static int parse_cpu_list(const char *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
+static int parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
 {
 	struct thread_data *td;
 	char *str0, *str;
 	int t;
 
 	if (!g->p.cpu_list_str)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks);
 
@@ -500,8 +500,12 @@ static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
 
 		dprintf("CPUs: %d_%d-%d#%dx%d\n", bind_cpu_0, bind_len, bind_cpu_1, step, mul);
 
-		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus);
-		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_1 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus);
+		if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus) {
+			printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d CPUs.\n", g->p.nr_cpus);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 < 0);
 		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 > bind_cpu_1);
 
 		for (bind_cpu = bind_cpu_0; bind_cpu <= bind_cpu_1; bind_cpu += step) {
@@ -541,6 +545,7 @@ static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
 		printf("# NOTE: %d tasks bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t);
 
 	free(str0);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int parse_cpus_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
@@ -561,14 +566,14 @@ static int parse_node_list(const char *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void parse_setup_node_list(void)
+static int parse_setup_node_list(void)
 {
 	struct thread_data *td;
 	char *str0, *str;
 	int t;
 
 	if (!g->p.node_list_str)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks);
 
@@ -619,8 +624,12 @@ static void parse_setup_node_list(void)
 
 		dprintf("NODEs: %d-%d #%d\n", bind_node_0, bind_node_1, step);
 
-		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes);
-		BUG_ON(bind_node_1 < 0 || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes);
+		if (bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes) {
+			printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d nodes.\n", g->p.nr_nodes);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_1 < 0);
 		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 > bind_node_1);
 
 		for (bind_node = bind_node_0; bind_node <= bind_node_1; bind_node += step) {
@@ -651,6 +660,7 @@ static void parse_setup_node_list(void)
 		printf("# NOTE: %d tasks mem-bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t);
 
 	free(str0);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int parse_nodes_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
@@ -1356,8 +1366,8 @@ static int init(void)
 	init_thread_data();
 
 	tprintf("#\n");
-	parse_setup_cpu_list();
-	parse_setup_node_list();
+	if (parse_setup_cpu_list() || parse_setup_node_list())
+		return -1;
 	tprintf("#\n");
 
 	print_summary();
@@ -1600,7 +1610,6 @@ static int run_bench_numa(const char *name, const char **argv)
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	usage_with_options(numa_usage, options);
 	return -1;
 }
 
@@ -1701,8 +1710,7 @@ static int bench_all(void)
 	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
-		if (run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1))
-			return -1;
+		run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1);
 	}
 
 	printf("\n");