[TCP]: Adjust {p,f}ackets_out correctly in tcp_retransmit_skb()

Well I've only found one potential cause for the assertion
failure in tcp_mark_head_lost.  First of all, this can only
occur if cnt > 1 since tp->packets_out is never zero here.
If it did hit zero we'd have much bigger problems.

So cnt is equal to fackets_out - reordering.  Normally
fackets_out is less than packets_out.  The only reason
I've found that might cause fackets_out to exceed packets_out
is if tcp_fragment is called from tcp_retransmit_skb with a
TSO skb and the current MSS is greater than the MSS stored
in the TSO skb.  This might occur as the result of an expiring
dst entry.

In that case, packets_out may decrease (line 1380-1381 in
tcp_output.c).  However, fackets_out is unchanged which means
that it may in fact exceed packets_out.

Previously tcp_retrans_try_collapse was the only place where
packets_out can go down and it takes care of this by decrementing
fackets_out.

So we should make sure that fackets_out is reduced by an appropriate
amount here as well.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/ipv4/tcp_output.c

@@ -1370,15 +1370,21 @@ int tcp_retransmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	if (skb->len > cur_mss) {
 		int old_factor = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
-		int new_factor;
+		int diff;
 
 		if (tcp_fragment(sk, skb, cur_mss, cur_mss))
 			return -ENOMEM; /* We'll try again later. */
 
 		/* New SKB created, account for it. */
-		new_factor = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
-		tp->packets_out -= old_factor - new_factor;
-		tp->packets_out += tcp_skb_pcount(skb->next);
+		diff = old_factor - tcp_skb_pcount(skb) -
+		       tcp_skb_pcount(skb->next);
+		tp->packets_out -= diff;
+
+		if (diff > 0) {
+			tp->fackets_out -= diff;
+			if ((int)tp->fackets_out < 0)
+				tp->fackets_out = 0;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* Collapse two adjacent packets if worthwhile and we can. */