提交 b5afd2c4 编写于 作者: M Miklos Szeredi 提交者: Al Viro

vfs: fix vfs_rename_dir for FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems

vfs_rename_dir() doesn't properly account for filesystems with
FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE.  If new_dentry has a target inode attached, it
unhashes the new_dentry prior to the rename() iop and rehashes it after,
but doesn't account for the possibility that rename() may have swapped
{old,new}_dentry.  For FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems, it rehashes
new_dentry (now the old renamed-from name, which d_move() expected to go
away), such that a subsequent lookup will find it.  Currently all
FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems compensate for this by failing in
d_revalidate.

The bug was introduced by: commit 349457cc
"[PATCH] Allow file systems to manually d_move() inside of ->rename()"

Fix by not rehashing the new dentry.  Rehashing used to be needed by
d_move() but isn't anymore.
Reported-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 5c5d3f3b
......@@ -2989,8 +2989,6 @@ static int vfs_rename_dir(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
dont_mount(new_dentry);
}
mutex_unlock(&target->i_mutex);
if (d_unhashed(new_dentry))
d_rehash(new_dentry);
}
if (!error)
if (!(old_dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册