提交 b1b8afb8 编写于 作者: J Jack Morgenstein 提交者: Roland Dreier

IB/uverbs: Return ENOSYS for unimplemented commands (not EINVAL)

Since the original commit 883a99c7 ("[IB] uverbs: Add a mask of device
methods allowed for userspace"), the uverbs core returns EINVAL for
commands not implemented by a specific low-level driver.

This creates a problem that there is no way to tell the difference
between an unimplemented command and an implemented one which is
incorrectly invoked (which also returns EINVAL).

The fix is to have unimplemented commands return ENOSYS.
Signed-off-by: NJack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
上级 e1d7806d
......@@ -584,14 +584,16 @@ static ssize_t ib_uverbs_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
if (hdr.command < 0 ||
hdr.command >= ARRAY_SIZE(uverbs_cmd_table) ||
!uverbs_cmd_table[hdr.command] ||
!(file->device->ib_dev->uverbs_cmd_mask & (1ull << hdr.command)))
!uverbs_cmd_table[hdr.command])
return -EINVAL;
if (!file->ucontext &&
hdr.command != IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_GET_CONTEXT)
return -EINVAL;
if (!(file->device->ib_dev->uverbs_cmd_mask & (1ull << hdr.command)))
return -ENOSYS;
return uverbs_cmd_table[hdr.command](file, buf + sizeof hdr,
hdr.in_words * 4, hdr.out_words * 4);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册