提交 ad3543ed 编写于 作者: M Mario Kleiner 提交者: Dave Airlie

drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into kms driver.

Move the ktime_get() clock readouts and potential preempt_disable()
calls from drm core into kms driver to make it compatible with the
api changes in the drm core.

The intel-kms driver needs to take the uncore.lock inside
i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos() and intel_pipe_in_vblank().
This is incompatible with the preempt_disable() on a
PREEMPT_RT patched kernel, as regular spin locks must not
be taken within a preempt_disable'd section. Lock contention
on the uncore.lock also introduced too much uncertainty in vblank
timestamps.

Push the ktime_get() timestamping for scanoutpos queries and
potential preempt_disable_rt() into i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(),
so these problems can be avoided:

1. First lock the uncore.lock (might sleep on a PREEMPT_RT kernel).
2. preempt_disable_rt() (will be added by the rt-linux folks).
3. ktime_get() a timestamp before scanout pos query.
4. Do all mmio reads as fast as possible without grabbing any new locks!
5. ktime_get() a post-query timestamp.
6. preempt_enable_rt()
7. Unlock the uncore.lock.

This reduces timestamp uncertainty on a low-end HP Atom Mini netbook
with Intel GMA-950 nicely:

Before: 3-8 usecs with spikes > 20 usecs, triggering query retries.
After : Typically 1 usec (98% of all samples), occassionally 2 usecs
        (2% of all samples), with maximum of 3 usecs (a handful).

v2: Fix formatting of new multi-line code comments.
Signed-off-by: NMario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
上级 d47abc58
......@@ -599,35 +599,40 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
return I915_READ(reg);
}
static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
/* raw reads, only for fast reads of display block, no need for forcewake etc. */
#define __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv__, reg__) readl((dev_priv__)->regs + (reg__))
#define __raw_i915_read16(dev_priv__, reg__) readw((dev_priv__)->regs + (reg__))
static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank_locked(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
uint32_t status;
int reg;
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
return I915_READ(VLV_ISR) & status;
reg = VLV_ISR;
} else if (IS_GEN2(dev)) {
status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
return I915_READ16(ISR) & status;
reg = ISR;
} else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5) {
status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_VBLANK_INTERRUPT :
I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_VBLANK_INTERRUPT;
return I915_READ(ISR) & status;
reg = ISR;
} else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 7) {
status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
DE_PIPEA_VBLANK :
DE_PIPEB_VBLANK;
return I915_READ(DEISR) & status;
reg = DEISR;
} else {
switch (pipe) {
default:
......@@ -642,12 +647,17 @@ static bool intel_pipe_in_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
break;
}
return I915_READ(DEISR) & status;
reg = DEISR;
}
if (IS_GEN2(dev))
return __raw_i915_read16(dev_priv, reg) & status;
else
return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, reg) & status;
}
static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
int *vpos, int *hpos)
int *vpos, int *hpos, ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
......@@ -657,6 +667,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
int vbl_start, vbl_end, htotal, vtotal;
bool in_vbl = true;
int ret = 0;
unsigned long irqflags;
if (!intel_crtc->active) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("trying to get scanoutpos for disabled "
......@@ -671,14 +682,27 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
ret |= DRM_SCANOUTPOS_VALID | DRM_SCANOUTPOS_ACCURATE;
/*
* Lock uncore.lock, as we will do multiple timing critical raw
* register reads, potentially with preemption disabled, so the
* following code must not block on uncore.lock.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
/* preempt_disable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
/* Get optional system timestamp before query. */
if (stime)
*stime = ktime_get();
if (IS_GEN2(dev) || IS_G4X(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
/* No obvious pixelcount register. Only query vertical
* scanout position from Display scan line register.
*/
if (IS_GEN2(dev))
position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN2;
position = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN2;
else
position = I915_READ(PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
position = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, PIPEDSL(pipe)) & DSL_LINEMASK_GEN3;
/*
* The scanline counter increments at the leading edge
......@@ -687,7 +711,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
* to get a more accurate picture whether we're in vblank
* or not.
*/
in_vbl = intel_pipe_in_vblank(dev, pipe);
in_vbl = intel_pipe_in_vblank_locked(dev, pipe);
if ((in_vbl && position == vbl_start - 1) ||
(!in_vbl && position == vbl_end - 1))
position = (position + 1) % vtotal;
......@@ -696,7 +720,7 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
* We can split this into vertical and horizontal
* scanout position.
*/
position = (I915_READ(PIPEFRAMEPIXEL(pipe)) & PIPE_PIXEL_MASK) >> PIPE_PIXEL_SHIFT;
position = (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, PIPEFRAMEPIXEL(pipe)) & PIPE_PIXEL_MASK) >> PIPE_PIXEL_SHIFT;
/* convert to pixel counts */
vbl_start *= htotal;
......@@ -704,6 +728,14 @@ static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
vtotal *= htotal;
}
/* Get optional system timestamp after query. */
if (etime)
*etime = ktime_get();
/* preempt_enable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
in_vbl = position >= vbl_start && position < vbl_end;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册