xen-netback: fix guest-receive-side array sizes

The sizes chosen for the metadata and grant_copy_op arrays on the guest
receive size are wrong;

- The meta array is needlessly twice the ring size, when we only ever
  consume a single array element per RX ring slot
- The grant_copy_op array is way too small. It's sized based on a bogus
  assumption: that at most two copy ops will be used per ring slot. This
  may have been true at some point in the past but it's clear from looking
  at start_new_rx_buffer() that a new ring slot is only consumed if a frag
  would overflow the current slot (plus some other conditions) so the actual
  limit is MAX_SKB_FRAGS grant_copy_ops per ring slot.

This patch fixes those two sizing issues and, because grant_copy_ops grows
so much, it pulls it out into a separate chunk of vmalloc()ed memory.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Acked-by: NWei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h

@@ -101,6 +101,13 @@ struct xenvif_rx_meta {
 
 #define MAX_PENDING_REQS 256
 
+/* It's possible for an skb to have a maximal number of frags
+ * but still be less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in size. Thus the
+ * worst-case number of copy operations is MAX_SKB_FRAGS per
+ * ring slot.
+ */
+#define MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE)
+
 struct xenvif {
 	/* Unique identifier for this interface. */
 	domid_t          domid;
@@ -143,13 +150,13 @@ struct xenvif {
 	 */
 	RING_IDX rx_req_cons_peek;
 
-	/* Given MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET of 4096 the worst case is that each
-	 * head/fragment page uses 2 copy operations because it
-	 * straddles two buffers in the frontend.
-	 */
-	struct gnttab_copy grant_copy_op[2*XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
-	struct xenvif_rx_meta meta[2*XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
+	/* This array is allocated seperately as it is large */
+	struct gnttab_copy *grant_copy_op;
 
+	/* We create one meta structure per ring request we consume, so
+	 * the maximum number is the same as the ring size.
+	 */
+	struct xenvif_rx_meta meta[XEN_NETIF_RX_RING_SIZE];
 
 	u8               fe_dev_addr[6];
 

drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c

@@ -307,6 +307,15 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid,
 	SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, parent);
 
 	vif = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+	vif->grant_copy_op = vmalloc(sizeof(struct gnttab_copy) *
+				     MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
+	if (vif->grant_copy_op == NULL) {
+		pr_warn("Could not allocate grant copy space for %s\n", name);
+		free_netdev(dev);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
 	vif->domid  = domid;
 	vif->handle = handle;
 	vif->can_sg = 1;
@@ -487,6 +496,7 @@ void xenvif_free(struct xenvif *vif)
 
 	unregister_netdev(vif->dev);
 
+	vfree(vif->grant_copy_op);
 	free_netdev(vif->dev);
 
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);

drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c

@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif *vif)
 	if (!npo.copy_prod)
 		return;
 
-	BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > ARRAY_SIZE(vif->grant_copy_op));
+	BUG_ON(npo.copy_prod > MAX_GRANT_COPY_OPS);
 	gnttab_batch_copy(vif->grant_copy_op, npo.copy_prod);
 
 	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&rxq)) != NULL) {