提交 a87ff62a 编写于 作者: M Maarten Maathuis 提交者: Ben Skeggs

drm/nv50: delete ramfc object after disabling fifo, not before

ramfc is zero'ed upon destruction, so it's safer to do things in the right
order.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Maathuis <madman2003@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
上级 a51a3bf5
......@@ -317,17 +317,20 @@ void
nv50_fifo_destroy_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan)
{
struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev;
struct nouveau_gpuobj_ref *ramfc = chan->ramfc;
NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id);
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->ramfc);
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache);
/* This will ensure the channel is seen as disabled. */
chan->ramfc = NULL;
nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, chan->id, false);
/* Dummy channel, also used on ch 127 */
if (chan->id == 0)
nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, 127, false);
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &ramfc);
nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache);
}
int
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册