提交 a84b69cb 编写于 作者: A Al Viro

9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC

If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.2 and later
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 43c3dd08
......@@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected;
goto reterr;
if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
goto reterr;
}
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册