drm/i915: Correct sandybrige overclocking
Change the gen6+ max delay if the pcode read was successful (not the inverse). The previous code was all sorts of wrong and has existed since I broke it: commit 42c0526c Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Wed Sep 26 10:34:00 2012 -0700 drm/i915: Extract PCU communication I added some parentheses for clarity, and I also corrected the debug message message to use the mask (wrong before I came along) and added a print to show the value we're changing from. Looking over the code, I'm not actually sure what we're trying to do. I introduced the bug simply by extracting the function not implementing anything new. We already set max_delay based on the capabilities register (which is what we use elsewhere to determine min and max). This would potentially increase it, I suppose? Jesse, I can't find the document which explains the definitions of the pcode commands, maybe you have it around. Based on Jesse's response, this could potentially be for -fixes, or stable, or maybe lead to us dropping it entirely. As the current code is is, things won't completely break because of the aforementioned capabilities register, and in my experimentation, enabling this has no effect, it goes from 1100->1100. I found this while reviewing Jesse's VLV patches. Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> [danvet: Bikeshed-away the redudant parens spotted by Chris Wilson.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录