e1000e: e1000e_cyclecounter_read(): fix er32(SYSTIML) overflow check

If two consecutive reads of the counter are the same, it is also
not an overflow.  "systimel_1 < systimel_2" should be
"systimel_1 <= systimel_2".

Before the patch, we could perform an *erroneous* correction:

Let's say that systimel_1 == systimel_2 == 0xffffffff.
"systimel_1 < systimel_2" is false, we think it's an overflow,
we read "systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH)" which meanwhile had incremented,
and use "(systimeh << 32) + systimel_2" value which is 2^32 too large.
Signed-off-by: NDenys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Tested-by: NAaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c

@@ -4287,7 +4287,7 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
 	systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH);
 	systimel_2 = er32(SYSTIML);
 	/* Check for overflow. If there was no overflow, use the values */
-	if (systimel_1 < systimel_2) {
+	if (systimel_1 <= systimel_2) {
 		systim = (cycle_t)systimel_1;
 		systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
 	} else {