提交 9d2f510a 编写于 作者: N Nicholas Piggin 提交者: Michael Ellerman

powerpc/64s/idle: avoid POWER9 DD1 and DD2.0 ERAT workaround on DD2.1

DD2.1 does not have to flush the ERAT after a state-loss idle.

Performance testing was done on a DD2.1 using only the stop0 idle state
(the shallowest state which supports state loss), using context_switch
selftest configured to ping-poing between two threads on the same core
and two different cores.

Performance improvement for same core is 7.0%, different cores is 14.8%.
Reviewed-by: NVaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
上级 b6b3755e
...@@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ pnv_restore_hyp_resource_arch300: ...@@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ pnv_restore_hyp_resource_arch300:
* then clear bit 60 in MMCRA to ensure the PMU starts running. * then clear bit 60 in MMCRA to ensure the PMU starts running.
*/ */
blt cr3,1f blt cr3,1f
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
PPC_INVALIDATE_ERAT PPC_INVALIDATE_ERAT
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD1 | CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD20)
ld r1,PACAR1(r13) ld r1,PACAR1(r13)
mfspr r4,SPRN_MMCRA mfspr r4,SPRN_MMCRA
ori r4,r4,(1 << (63-60)) ori r4,r4,(1 << (63-60))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册