x86/microcode: Use kmemdup() rather than duplicating its implementation

The patch was generated using fixed coccinelle semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci.
Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455612202-14414-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c

@@ -788,15 +788,13 @@ static int verify_and_add_patch(u8 family, u8 *fw, unsigned int leftover)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	patch->data = kzalloc(patch_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	patch->data = kmemdup(fw + SECTION_HDR_SIZE, patch_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!patch->data) {
 		pr_err("Patch data allocation failure.\n");
 		kfree(patch);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* All looks ok, copy patch... */
-	memcpy(patch->data, fw + SECTION_HDR_SIZE, patch_size);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&patch->plist);
 	patch->patch_id  = mc_hdr->patch_id;
 	patch->equiv_cpu = proc_id;

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c

@@ -210,13 +210,11 @@ save_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mcs,
 		mc_hdr = &mc->hdr;
 		size   = get_totalsize(mc_hdr);
 
-		saved_ptr[i] = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		saved_ptr[i] = kmemdup(mc, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!saved_ptr[i]) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto err;
 		}
-
-		memcpy(saved_ptr[i], mc, size);
 	}
 
 	/*