提交 9a9e3dfd 编写于 作者: M Mahesh Kumar 提交者: Paulo Zanoni

drm/i915/icl: Don't allocate fixed bypass path blocks for ICL

GEN9 onwards bypass path allocation of 4 blocks was needed, as per
hardware design. ICL doesn't require bypass path allocation of 4 DDB
blocks, handling the same in this patch.

v2 (from Paulo):
  - No need for a comment that says what the code already says.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180130134918.32283-2-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
上级 5b364bec
...@@ -3778,7 +3778,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev, ...@@ -3778,7 +3778,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size; ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size;
WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0); WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0);
ddb_size -= 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
ddb_size -= 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */
/* /*
* If the state doesn't change the active CRTC's, then there's * If the state doesn't change the active CRTC's, then there's
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册