resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces
[ Upstream commit a98959fdbda1849a01b2150bb635ed559ec06700 ] find_next_iomem_res() finds an iomem resource that covers part of a range described by "start, end". All callers expect that range to be inclusive, i.e., both start and end are included, but find_next_iomem_res() doesn't handle the end address correctly. If it finds an iomem resource that contains exactly the end address, it skips it, e.g., if "start, end" is [0x0-0x10000] and there happens to be an iomem resource [mem 0x10000-0x10000] (the single byte at 0x10000), we skip it: find_next_iomem_res(...) { start = 0x0; end = 0x10000; for (p = next_resource(...)) { # p->start = 0x10000; # p->end = 0x10000; # we *should* return this resource, but this condition is false: if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end)) break; Adjust find_next_iomem_res() so it allows a resource that includes the single byte at the end of the range. This is a corner case that we probably don't see in practice. Fixes: 58c1b5b0 ("[PATCH] memory hotadd fixes: find_next_system_ram catch range fix") Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> CC: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> CC: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> CC: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com> CC: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CC: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> CC: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com> CC: bhe@redhat.com CC: dan.j.williams@intel.com CC: dyoung@redhat.com CC: kexec@lists.infradead.org CC: mingo@redhat.com CC: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153805812254.1157.16736368485811773752.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录