提交 97fbf573 编写于 作者: T Theodore Ts'o 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode

[ Upstream commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 ]

Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the
block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger
a failure.

This was causing failures like this:

[   53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode
#8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0)
[   53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8
[   53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8.

... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that
logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the
extent cache.  (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.)

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: NDan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: NNaresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
上级 1e88a1f8
......@@ -518,10 +518,14 @@ __read_extent_tree_block(const char *function, unsigned int line,
}
if (buffer_verified(bh) && !(flags & EXT4_EX_FORCE_CACHE))
return bh;
err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode,
ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk);
if (err)
goto errout;
if (!ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) ||
(inode->i_ino !=
le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum))) {
err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode,
ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk);
if (err)
goto errout;
}
set_buffer_verified(bh);
/*
* If this is a leaf block, cache all of its entries
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册