提交 9330ed16 编写于 作者: D David S. Miller

Merge branch 'bonding_fail_over_mac'

Ding Tianhong says:

====================
bonding: Fix some issues for fail_over_mac

The parameter fail_over_mac only affect active-backup mode, if it was
set to active or follow and works with other modes, just like RR or XOR
mode, the bonding could not set all slaves to the master's address, it
will cause the slave could not work well with master.

v1->v2: According Jay's suggestion, that we should permit setting an option
	at any time, but only have it take effect in active-backup mode, so
	I add mode checking together with fail_over_mac during enslavement and
	rebuild the patches.

v2->v3: The correct way to fix the problem is that we should not add restrictions when
    	setting options, just need to modify the bond enslave and removal processing
    	to check the mode in addition to fail_over_mac when setting a slave's MAC during
    	enslavement. The change active slave processing already only calls the fail_over_mac
    	function when in active-backup mode.

	Remove the cleanup patch because the net-next is frozen now.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
...@@ -1270,9 +1270,13 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) ...@@ -1270,9 +1270,13 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
if (slave_ops->ndo_set_mac_address == NULL) { if (slave_ops->ndo_set_mac_address == NULL) {
if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) { if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
pr_warning("%s: Warning: The first slave device specified does not support setting the MAC address. Setting fail_over_mac to active.", pr_warn("%s: Warning: The first slave device specified does not support setting the MAC address.\n",
bond_dev->name); bond_dev->name);
bond->params.fail_over_mac = BOND_FOM_ACTIVE; if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
bond->params.fail_over_mac = BOND_FOM_ACTIVE;
pr_warn("%s: Setting fail_over_mac to active for active-backup mode.\n",
bond_dev->name);
}
} else if (bond->params.fail_over_mac != BOND_FOM_ACTIVE) { } else if (bond->params.fail_over_mac != BOND_FOM_ACTIVE) {
pr_err("%s: Error: The slave device specified does not support setting the MAC address, but fail_over_mac is not set to active.\n", pr_err("%s: Error: The slave device specified does not support setting the MAC address, but fail_over_mac is not set to active.\n",
bond_dev->name); bond_dev->name);
...@@ -1315,7 +1319,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) ...@@ -1315,7 +1319,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
*/ */
memcpy(new_slave->perm_hwaddr, slave_dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN); memcpy(new_slave->perm_hwaddr, slave_dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) { if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac ||
bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
/* /*
* Set slave to master's mac address. The application already * Set slave to master's mac address. The application already
* set the master's mac address to that of the first slave * set the master's mac address to that of the first slave
...@@ -1579,7 +1584,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) ...@@ -1579,7 +1584,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
dev_close(slave_dev); dev_close(slave_dev);
err_restore_mac: err_restore_mac:
if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) { if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac ||
bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
/* XXX TODO - fom follow mode needs to change master's /* XXX TODO - fom follow mode needs to change master's
* MAC if this slave's MAC is in use by the bond, or at * MAC if this slave's MAC is in use by the bond, or at
* least print a warning. * least print a warning.
...@@ -1672,7 +1678,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev, ...@@ -1672,7 +1678,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
bond->current_arp_slave = NULL; bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
if (!all && !bond->params.fail_over_mac) { if (!all && (!bond->params.fail_over_mac ||
bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)) {
if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) && if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) &&
bond_has_slaves(bond)) bond_has_slaves(bond))
pr_warn("%s: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of %s - %pM - is still in use by %s. Set the HWaddr of %s to a different address to avoid conflicts.\n", pr_warn("%s: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of %s - %pM - is still in use by %s. Set the HWaddr of %s to a different address to avoid conflicts.\n",
...@@ -1769,7 +1776,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev, ...@@ -1769,7 +1776,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
/* close slave before restoring its mac address */ /* close slave before restoring its mac address */
dev_close(slave_dev); dev_close(slave_dev);
if (bond->params.fail_over_mac != BOND_FOM_ACTIVE) { if (bond->params.fail_over_mac != BOND_FOM_ACTIVE ||
bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
/* restore original ("permanent") mac address */ /* restore original ("permanent") mac address */
memcpy(addr.sa_data, slave->perm_hwaddr, ETH_ALEN); memcpy(addr.sa_data, slave->perm_hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
addr.sa_family = slave_dev->type; addr.sa_family = slave_dev->type;
...@@ -3431,7 +3439,8 @@ static int bond_set_mac_address(struct net_device *bond_dev, void *addr) ...@@ -3431,7 +3439,8 @@ static int bond_set_mac_address(struct net_device *bond_dev, void *addr)
/* If fail_over_mac is enabled, do nothing and return success. /* If fail_over_mac is enabled, do nothing and return success.
* Returning an error causes ifenslave to fail. * Returning an error causes ifenslave to fail.
*/ */
if (bond->params.fail_over_mac) if (bond->params.fail_over_mac &&
bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
return 0; return 0;
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(sa->sa_data)) if (!is_valid_ether_addr(sa->sa_data))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册