提交 9016083b 编写于 作者: G Gerald Schaefer 提交者: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/hugetlb: use direct TLB flushing for hugetlbfs pages

huge_ptep_get_and_clear() is either missing a TLB invalidation or
an mm->context.attach_count check. Since the attach_count logic was
introduced with normal ptes in mind, let's just use direct TLB
flushing for hugetlbfs pages.
Signed-off-by: NGerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
上级 d5feaea3
......@@ -66,16 +66,6 @@ static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get(pte_t *ptep)
return pte;
}
static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
mm->context.flush_mm = 1;
pmd_clear((pmd_t *) ptep);
return pte;
}
static inline void __pmd_csp(pmd_t *pmdp)
{
register unsigned long reg2 asm("2") = pmd_val(*pmdp);
......@@ -117,6 +107,15 @@ static inline void huge_ptep_invalidate(struct mm_struct *mm,
__pmd_csp(pmdp);
}
static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
huge_ptep_invalidate(mm, addr, ptep);
return pte;
}
#define huge_ptep_set_access_flags(__vma, __addr, __ptep, __entry, __dirty) \
({ \
int __changed = !pte_same(huge_ptep_get(__ptep), __entry); \
......@@ -131,10 +130,7 @@ static inline void huge_ptep_invalidate(struct mm_struct *mm,
({ \
pte_t __pte = huge_ptep_get(__ptep); \
if (pte_write(__pte)) { \
(__mm)->context.flush_mm = 1; \
if (atomic_read(&(__mm)->context.attach_count) > 1 || \
(__mm) != current->active_mm) \
huge_ptep_invalidate(__mm, __addr, __ptep); \
huge_ptep_invalidate(__mm, __addr, __ptep); \
set_huge_pte_at(__mm, __addr, __ptep, \
huge_pte_wrprotect(__pte)); \
} \
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册