提交 8eef64a2 编写于 作者: A Aleksa Sarai 提交者: Joseph Qi

namei: only return -ECHILD from follow_dotdot_rcu()

to #26323588

commit 2b98149c2377bff12be5dd3ce02ae0506e2dd613 upstream.

It's over-zealous to return hard errors under RCU-walk here, given that
a REF-walk will be triggered for all other cases handling ".." under
RCU.

The original purpose of this check was to ensure that if a rename occurs
such that a directory is moved outside of the bind-mount which the
resolution started in, it would be detected and blocked to avoid being
able to mess with paths outside of the bind-mount. However, triggering a
new REF-walk is just as effective a solution.

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Fixes: 397d425d ("vfs: Test for and handle paths that are unreachable from their mnt_root")
Suggested-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
上级 41076b20
......@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
nd->path.dentry = parent;
nd->seq = seq;
if (unlikely(!path_connected(&nd->path)))
return -ENOENT;
return -ECHILD;
break;
} else {
struct mount *mnt = real_mount(nd->path.mnt);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册