提交 8d23f4ba 编写于 作者: V Vasu Dev 提交者: James Bottomley

[SCSI] libfc: don't call resp handler after FC_EX_TIMEOUT

In cases exch is already timed out then exch layer could
end up calling resp handler again for its response frame
received after timeout, though in this case fc_exch_timeout
handler would have already called resp with FC_EX_TIMEOUT.

This would cause REC response handler to release its
fsp pkt hold twice instead once and possibly similar issues
with other ELS exchanges in this race.

To avoid this race have resp updated under exch lock
in rx path, the resp would get set to NULL in case
of FC_EX_TIMEOUT under the same lock to prevent resp
callback after FC_EX_TIMEOUT.
Signed-off-by: NVasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Tested-by: NRoss Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
上级 6a716a85
...@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp) ...@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
(f_ctl & (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) == (f_ctl & (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) ==
(FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) { (FC_FC_LAST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ)) {
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
resp = ep->resp;
rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep); rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep);
WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep); WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep);
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册