提交 8a95408e 编写于 作者: E Eduardo Habkost 提交者: Ingo Molnar

xen64: Clear %fs on xen_load_tls()

We need to do this, otherwise we can get a GPF on hypercall return
after TLS descriptor is cleared but %fs is still pointing to it.
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 4a5c3e77
......@@ -364,14 +364,6 @@ static void load_TLS_descriptor(struct thread_struct *t,
static void xen_load_tls(struct thread_struct *t, unsigned int cpu)
{
xen_mc_batch();
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 0);
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 1);
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 2);
xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
/*
* XXX sleazy hack: If we're being called in a lazy-cpu zone,
* it means we're in a context switch, and %gs has just been
......@@ -380,9 +372,30 @@ static void xen_load_tls(struct thread_struct *t, unsigned int cpu)
* Either way, it has been saved, and the new value will get
* loaded properly. This will go away as soon as Xen has been
* modified to not save/restore %gs for normal hypercalls.
*
* On x86_64, this hack is not used for %gs, because gs points
* to KERNEL_GS_BASE (and uses it for PDA references), so we
* must not zero %gs on x86_64
*
* For x86_64, we need to zero %fs, otherwise we may get an
* exception between the new %fs descriptor being loaded and
* %fs being effectively cleared at __switch_to().
*/
if (paravirt_get_lazy_mode() == PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU)
if (paravirt_get_lazy_mode() == PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU) {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
loadsegment(gs, 0);
#else
loadsegment(fs, 0);
#endif
}
xen_mc_batch();
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 0);
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 1);
load_TLS_descriptor(t, cpu, 2);
xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册