提交 8a1a6272 编写于 作者: D David Woodhouse

Revert "[MTD] m25p80.c code cleanup"

This reverts commit 75d0ee22.

Although it seems ObviouslyCorrect™, the spi_write() call uses DMA,
while spi_write_then_read() does not. Since our buffer is on the stack,
we must use the latter even though we don't actually want to read
anything back.

Pointed out by David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
上级 7d28e0d1
......@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline int write_enable(struct m25p *flash)
{
u8 code = OPCODE_WREN;
return spi_write(flash->spi, &code, 1);
return spi_write_then_read(flash->spi, &code, 1, NULL, 0);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册