Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

The Code of Conflict is not achieving its implicit goal of fostering
civility and the spirit of 'be excellent to each other'.  Explicit
guidelines have demonstrated success in other projects and other areas
of the kernel.

Here is a Code of Conduct statement for the wider kernel.  It is based
on the Contributor Covenant as described at www.contributor-covenant.org

From this point forward, we should abide by these rules in order to help
make the kernel community a welcoming environment to participate in.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lxom.net>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst

+Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
+Our Pledge
+==========
+
+In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
+contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and
+our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
+size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and
+expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality,
+personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
+
+Our Standards
+=============
+
+Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
+include:
+
+* Using welcoming and inclusive language
+* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
+* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
+* Focusing on what is best for the community
+* Showing empathy towards other community members
+
+
+Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
+
+* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
+  advances
+* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
+* Public or private harassment
+* Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
+  address, without explicit permission
+* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
+  professional setting
+
+
+Our Responsibilities
+====================
+
+Maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior
+and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to
+any instances of unacceptable behavior.
+
+Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
+comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
+not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any
+contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening,
+offensive, or harmful.
+
+Scope
+=====
+
+This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces
+when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of
+representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail
+address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
+representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be
+further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
+
+Enforcement
+===========
+
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
+reported by contacting the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) at
+<tab@lists.linux-foundation.org>. All complaints will be reviewed and
+investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and
+appropriate to the circumstances. The TAB is obligated to maintain
+confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.  Further details of
+specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
+
+Maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may
+face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the
+project’s leadership.
+
+Attribution
+===========
+
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 1.4,
+available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html

Documentation/process/code-of-conflict.rst

-Code of Conflict
-----------------
-
-The Linux kernel development effort is a very personal process compared
-to "traditional" ways of developing software.  Your code and ideas
-behind it will be carefully reviewed, often resulting in critique and
-criticism.  The review will almost always require improvements to the
-code before it can be included in the kernel.  Know that this happens
-because everyone involved wants to see the best possible solution for
-the overall success of Linux.  This development process has been proven
-to create the most robust operating system kernel ever, and we do not
-want to do anything to cause the quality of submission and eventual
-result to ever decrease.
-
-If however, anyone feels personally abused, threatened, or otherwise
-uncomfortable due to this process, that is not acceptable.  If so,
-please contact the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board at
-<tab@lists.linux-foundation.org>, or the individual members, and they
-will work to resolve the issue to the best of their ability.  For more
-information on who is on the Technical Advisory Board and what their
-role is, please see:
-
-	- http://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects/linux/tab
-
-As a reviewer of code, please strive to keep things civil and focused on
-the technical issues involved.  We are all humans, and frustrations can
-be high on both sides of the process.  Try to keep in mind the immortal
-words of Bill and Ted, "Be excellent to each other."

Documentation/process/index.rst

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Below are the essential guides that every developer should read.
    :maxdepth: 1
 
    howto
-   code-of-conflict
+   code-of-conduct
    development-process
    submitting-patches
    coding-style