提交 89d798b7 编写于 作者: M Marc Zyngier 提交者: Russell King

ARM: 8487/1: Remove IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE

Since 9a46ad6d ("smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
similar to smp_call_function_single()"), the core IPI handling
has been simplified, and generic_smp_call_function_interrupt is
now the same as generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt.

This means that one of IPI_CALL_FUNC and IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE has
become redundant. We can then safely drop IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE,
and use only IPI_CALL_FUNC.

This has the advantage of reducing the number of SGI IDs we're using
(a fairly scarse resource).

Tested on a dual A7 board.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
上级 f6419f24
......@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#define NR_IPI 8
#define NR_IPI 7
typedef struct {
unsigned int __softirq_pending;
......
......@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_TIMER,
IPI_RESCHEDULE,
IPI_CALL_FUNC,
IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE,
IPI_CPU_STOP,
IPI_IRQ_WORK,
IPI_COMPLETION,
......@@ -475,7 +474,6 @@ static const char *ipi_types[NR_IPI] __tracepoint_string = {
S(IPI_TIMER, "Timer broadcast interrupts"),
S(IPI_RESCHEDULE, "Rescheduling interrupts"),
S(IPI_CALL_FUNC, "Function call interrupts"),
S(IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE, "Single function call interrupts"),
S(IPI_CPU_STOP, "CPU stop interrupts"),
S(IPI_IRQ_WORK, "IRQ work interrupts"),
S(IPI_COMPLETION, "completion interrupts"),
......@@ -525,7 +523,7 @@ void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
{
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE);
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
......@@ -620,12 +618,6 @@ void handle_IPI(int ipinr, struct pt_regs *regs)
irq_exit();
break;
case IPI_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE:
irq_enter();
generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
irq_exit();
break;
case IPI_CPU_STOP:
irq_enter();
ipi_cpu_stop(cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册