perf probe: Remove redundant checks

While fixing an error propagating problem in f809b25 I added two
redundant checks.

I did that because I didn't expect the checks to be on the while and for
loop condition expression, where they are tested before we run the loop,
where the 'ret' variable is set.

So remove it from there and leave it just after it is actually set,
eliminating unneded tests.
Reported-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
上级 e603dc15
......@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
}
/* Loop 2: add all events */
for (i = 0; i < npevs && ret >= 0; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
ret = __add_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev, pkgs[i].tevs,
pkgs[i].ntevs, force_add);
if (ret < 0)
......
......@@ -1462,8 +1462,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
off = 0;
line_list__init(&pf->lcache);
/* Loop on CUs (Compilation Unit) */
while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL) &&
ret >= 0) {
while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL)) {
/* Get the DIE(Debugging Information Entry) of this CU */
diep = dwarf_offdie(dbg, off + cuhl, &pf->cu_die);
if (!diep)
......@@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
pf->lno = pp->line;
ret = find_probe_point_by_line(pf);
}
if (ret != DWARF_CB_OK)
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
off = noff;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册