提交 8591743f 编写于 作者: C Chen-Yu Tsai

ARM: sunxi: mc-smp: Use DT enable-method for sun9i A80 SMP

Instead of having an early init function check the machine compatible
and installing multi-cluster SMP support for the A80 if it matches,
use a new cpu enable-method string. This makes the platform support
future proof in case anyone manages to add PSCI support.

The original init code for the SMP support is changed into the
.prepare_cpus callback in the smp_operations structure. Instead of
panicing when resources are missing like on some platforms, our code
merely guards against engaging SMP or CPU hotplug and returns an error.
Acked-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
上级 c161daea
......@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ described below.
"actions,s500-smp"
"allwinner,sun6i-a31"
"allwinner,sun8i-a23"
"allwinner,sun9i-a80-smp"
"amlogic,meson8-smp"
"amlogic,meson8b-smp"
"arm,realview-smp"
......
......@@ -690,7 +690,26 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void)
struct resource res;
int ret;
if (!of_machine_is_compatible("allwinner,sun9i-a80"))
/*
* Don't bother checking the "cpus" node, as an enable-method
* property in that node is undocumented.
*/
node = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
if (!node)
return -ENODEV;
/*
* We can't actually use the enable-method magic in the kernel.
* Our loopback / trampoline code uses the CPU suspend framework,
* which requires the identity mapping be available. It would not
* yet be available if we used the .init_cpus or .prepare_cpus
* callbacks in smp_operations, which we would use if we were to
* use CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE
*/
ret = of_property_match_string(node, "enable-method",
"allwinner,sun9i-a80-smp");
of_node_put(node);
if (ret)
return -ENODEV;
if (!sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_table_init())
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册