Merge branch 'bpf-Improve-LRU-map-lookup-performance'

Martin KaFai Lau says:

====================
bpf: Improve LRU map lookup performance

This patchset improves the lookup performance of the LRU map.
Please see individual patch for details.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h

@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static inline void bpf_lru_node_set_ref(struct bpf_lru_node *node)
 	/* ref is an approximation on access frequency.  It does not
 	 * have to be very accurate.  Hence, no protection is used.
 	 */
-	node->ref = 1;
+	if (!node->ref)
+		node->ref = 1;
 }
 
 int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset,

kernel/bpf/hashtab.c

@@ -514,6 +514,29 @@ static void *htab_lru_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static u32 htab_lru_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map,
+				   struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+	const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
+	const int ref_reg = BPF_REG_1;
+
+	*insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))__htab_map_lookup_elem);
+	*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, ret, 0, 4);
+	*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, ref_reg, ret,
+			      offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
+			      offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref));
+	*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, ref_reg, 0, 1);
+	*insn++ = BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, ret,
+			     offsetof(struct htab_elem, lru_node) +
+			     offsetof(struct bpf_lru_node, ref),
+			     1);
+	*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, ret,
+				offsetof(struct htab_elem, key) +
+				round_up(map->key_size, 8));
+	return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
 /* It is called from the bpf_lru_list when the LRU needs to delete
  * older elements from the htab.
  */
@@ -1137,6 +1160,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_map_ops = {
 	.map_lookup_elem = htab_lru_map_lookup_elem,
 	.map_update_elem = htab_lru_map_update_elem,
 	.map_delete_elem = htab_lru_map_delete_elem,
+	.map_gen_lookup = htab_lru_map_gen_lookup,
 };
 
 /* Called from eBPF program */

samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c

@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") array_map = {
 	.max_entries = MAX_ENTRIES,
 };
 
+struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") lru_hash_lookup_map = {
+	.type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH,
+	.key_size = sizeof(u32),
+	.value_size = sizeof(long),
+	.max_entries = MAX_ENTRIES,
+};
+
 SEC("kprobe/sys_getuid")
 int stress_hmap(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
@@ -148,12 +155,23 @@ int stress_percpu_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 SEC("kprobe/sys_connect")
 int stress_lru_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
+	char fmt[] = "Failed at stress_lru_hmap_alloc. ret:%dn";
+	union {
+		u16 dst6[8];
+		struct {
+			u16 magic0;
+			u16 magic1;
+			u16 tcase;
+			u16 unused16;
+			u32 unused32;
+			u32 key;
+		};
+	} test_params;
 	struct sockaddr_in6 *in6;
-	u16 test_case, dst6[8];
+	u16 test_case;
 	int addrlen, ret;
-	char fmt[] = "Failed at stress_lru_hmap_alloc. ret:%d\n";
 	long val = 1;
-	u32 key = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+	u32 key = 0;
 
 	in6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx);
 	addrlen = (int)PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx);
@@ -161,14 +179,18 @@ int stress_lru_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	if (addrlen != sizeof(*in6))
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = bpf_probe_read(dst6, sizeof(dst6), &in6->sin6_addr);
+	ret = bpf_probe_read(test_params.dst6, sizeof(test_params.dst6),
+			     &in6->sin6_addr);
 	if (ret)
 		goto done;
 
-	if (dst6[0] != 0xdead || dst6[1] != 0xbeef)
+	if (test_params.magic0 != 0xdead ||
+	    test_params.magic1 != 0xbeef)
 		return 0;
 
-	test_case = dst6[7];
+	test_case = test_params.tcase;
+	if (test_case != 3)
+		key = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
 
 	if (test_case == 0) {
 		ret = bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_hash_map, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
@@ -188,6 +210,16 @@ int stress_lru_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 
 		ret = bpf_map_update_elem(nolocal_lru_map, &key, &val,
 					  BPF_ANY);
+	} else if (test_case == 3) {
+		u32 i;
+
+		key = test_params.key;
+
+#pragma clang loop unroll(full)
+		for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+			bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lru_hash_lookup_map, &key);
+			key++;
+		}
 	} else {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}

samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ enum test_type {
 	HASH_LOOKUP,
 	ARRAY_LOOKUP,
 	INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC,
+	LRU_HASH_LOOKUP,
 	NR_TESTS,
 };
 
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ const char *test_map_names[NR_TESTS] = {
 	[HASH_LOOKUP] = "hash_map",
 	[ARRAY_LOOKUP] = "array_map",
 	[INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC] = "inner_lru_hash_map",
+	[LRU_HASH_LOOKUP] = "lru_hash_lookup_map",
 };
 
 static int test_flags = ~0;
@@ -67,6 +69,8 @@ static uint32_t num_map_entries;
 static uint32_t inner_lru_hash_size;
 static int inner_lru_hash_idx = -1;
 static int array_of_lru_hashs_idx = -1;
+static int lru_hash_lookup_idx = -1;
+static int lru_hash_lookup_test_entries = 32;
 static uint32_t max_cnt = 1000000;
 
 static int check_test_flags(enum test_type t)
@@ -86,6 +90,32 @@ static void test_hash_prealloc(int cpu)
 	       cpu, max_cnt * 1000000000ll / (time_get_ns() - start_time));
 }
 
+static int pre_test_lru_hash_lookup(int tasks)
+{
+	int fd = map_fd[lru_hash_lookup_idx];
+	uint32_t key;
+	long val = 1;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (num_map_entries > lru_hash_lookup_test_entries)
+		lru_hash_lookup_test_entries = num_map_entries;
+
+	/* Populate the lru_hash_map for LRU_HASH_LOOKUP perf test.
+	 *
+	 * It is fine that the user requests for a map with
+	 * num_map_entries < 32 and some of the later lru hash lookup
+	 * may return not found.  For LRU map, we are not interested
+	 * in such small map performance.
+	 */
+	for (key = 0; key < lru_hash_lookup_test_entries; key++) {
+		ret = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void do_test_lru(enum test_type test, int cpu)
 {
 	static int inner_lru_map_fds[MAX_NR_CPUS];
@@ -135,13 +165,17 @@ static void do_test_lru(enum test_type test, int cpu)
 
 	if (test == LRU_HASH_PREALLOC) {
 		test_name = "lru_hash_map_perf";
-		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[7] = 0;
+		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[2] = 0;
 	} else if (test == NOCOMMON_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC) {
 		test_name = "nocommon_lru_hash_map_perf";
-		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[7] = 1;
+		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[2] = 1;
 	} else if (test == INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC) {
 		test_name = "inner_lru_hash_map_perf";
-		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[7] = 2;
+		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[2] = 2;
+	} else if (test == LRU_HASH_LOOKUP) {
+		test_name = "lru_hash_lookup_perf";
+		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[2] = 3;
+		in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] = 0;
 	} else {
 		assert(0);
 	}
@@ -150,6 +184,11 @@ static void do_test_lru(enum test_type test, int cpu)
 	for (i = 0; i < max_cnt; i++) {
 		ret = connect(-1, (const struct sockaddr *)&in6, sizeof(in6));
 		assert(ret == -1 && errno == EBADF);
+		if (in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] <
+		    lru_hash_lookup_test_entries - 32)
+			in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] += 32;
+		else
+			in6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] = 0;
 	}
 	printf("%d:%s pre-alloc %lld events per sec\n",
 	       cpu, test_name,
@@ -171,6 +210,11 @@ static void test_inner_lru_hash_prealloc(int cpu)
 	do_test_lru(INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC, cpu);
 }
 
+static void test_lru_hash_lookup(int cpu)
+{
+	do_test_lru(LRU_HASH_LOOKUP, cpu);
+}
+
 static void test_percpu_hash_prealloc(int cpu)
 {
 	__u64 start_time;
@@ -243,6 +287,11 @@ static void test_array_lookup(int cpu)
 	       cpu, max_cnt * 1000000000ll * 64 / (time_get_ns() - start_time));
 }
 
+typedef int (*pre_test_func)(int tasks);
+const pre_test_func pre_test_funcs[] = {
+	[LRU_HASH_LOOKUP] = pre_test_lru_hash_lookup,
+};
+
 typedef void (*test_func)(int cpu);
 const test_func test_funcs[] = {
 	[HASH_PREALLOC] = test_hash_prealloc,
@@ -255,8 +304,25 @@ const test_func test_funcs[] = {
 	[HASH_LOOKUP] = test_hash_lookup,
 	[ARRAY_LOOKUP] = test_array_lookup,
 	[INNER_LRU_HASH_PREALLOC] = test_inner_lru_hash_prealloc,
+	[LRU_HASH_LOOKUP] = test_lru_hash_lookup,
 };
 
+static int pre_test(int tasks)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_TESTS; i++) {
+		if (pre_test_funcs[i] && check_test_flags(i)) {
+			int ret = pre_test_funcs[i](tasks);
+
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void loop(int cpu)
 {
 	cpu_set_t cpuset;
@@ -277,6 +343,8 @@ static void run_perf_test(int tasks)
 	pid_t pid[tasks];
 	int i;
 
+	assert(!pre_test(tasks));
+
 	for (i = 0; i < tasks; i++) {
 		pid[i] = fork();
 		if (pid[i] == 0) {
@@ -344,6 +412,9 @@ static void fixup_map(struct bpf_map_data *map, int idx)
 		array_of_lru_hashs_idx = idx;
 	}
 
+	if (!strcmp("lru_hash_lookup_map", map->name))
+		lru_hash_lookup_idx = idx;
+
 	if (num_map_entries <= 0)
 		return;