提交 80a74f7f 编写于 作者: B Ben Widawsky 提交者: Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Drop dev from pte_encode

The original pte_encode function needed the dev argument so we could do
platform specific handling via IS_GENX, etc. With the merging of a pte
encoding function there should never been a need to quirk away gen
specific details.

The patch doesn't do much but makes the upcoming reworks in gtt/ppgtt/mm
slightly (albeit, ever so) easier.
Reviewed-by: NKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
上级 67167240
......@@ -482,8 +482,7 @@ struct i915_gtt {
struct sg_table *st,
unsigned int pg_start,
enum i915_cache_level cache_level);
gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(struct drm_device *dev,
dma_addr_t addr,
gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level);
};
#define gtt_total_entries(gtt) ((gtt).total >> PAGE_SHIFT)
......@@ -503,8 +502,7 @@ struct i915_hw_ppgtt {
struct sg_table *st,
unsigned int pg_start,
enum i915_cache_level cache_level);
gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(struct drm_device *dev,
dma_addr_t addr,
gen6_gtt_pte_t (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level);
int (*enable)(struct drm_device *dev);
void (*cleanup)(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt);
......
......@@ -45,8 +45,7 @@
#define GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC_MLC (3 << 1)
#define GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) GEN6_GTT_ADDR_ENCODE(addr)
static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
dma_addr_t addr,
static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
......@@ -72,8 +71,7 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
#define BYT_PTE_WRITEABLE (1 << 1)
#define BYT_PTE_SNOOPED_BY_CPU_CACHES (1 << 2)
static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
dma_addr_t addr,
static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
......@@ -90,8 +88,7 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t byt_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
return pte;
}
static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(struct drm_device *dev,
dma_addr_t addr,
static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
enum i915_cache_level level)
{
gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
......@@ -194,8 +191,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_clear_range(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
unsigned first_pte = first_entry % I915_PPGTT_PT_ENTRIES;
unsigned last_pte, i;
scratch_pte = ppgtt->pte_encode(ppgtt->dev,
dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
scratch_pte = ppgtt->pte_encode(dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
I915_CACHE_LLC);
while (num_entries) {
......@@ -231,8 +227,7 @@ static void gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
dma_addr_t page_addr;
page_addr = sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter);
pt_vaddr[act_pte] = ppgtt->pte_encode(ppgtt->dev, page_addr,
cache_level);
pt_vaddr[act_pte] = ppgtt->pte_encode(page_addr, cache_level);
if (++act_pte == I915_PPGTT_PT_ENTRIES) {
kunmap_atomic(pt_vaddr);
act_pt++;
......@@ -483,7 +478,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct drm_device *dev,
for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->nents, 0) {
addr = sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter);
iowrite32(dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, addr, level),
iowrite32(dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(addr, level),
&gtt_entries[i]);
i++;
}
......@@ -496,7 +491,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct drm_device *dev,
*/
if (i != 0)
WARN_ON(readl(&gtt_entries[i-1])
!= dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, addr, level));
!= dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(addr, level));
/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
* want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
......@@ -521,7 +516,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_clear_range(struct drm_device *dev,
first_entry, num_entries, max_entries))
num_entries = max_entries;
scratch_pte = dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev, dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
scratch_pte = dev_priv->gtt.pte_encode(dev_priv->gtt.scratch.addr,
I915_CACHE_LLC);
for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++)
iowrite32(scratch_pte, &gtt_base[i]);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册