crypto: caam - de-CHIP-ify device tree compatibles
- all the integration parameters have been captured by the binding. - the block name really uniquely identifies this hardware. Some advocate putting SoC names everywhere in case software needs to work around some chip-specific bug, but more precise SoC information already exists in SVR, and board information already exists in the top-level device tree node. Note that sometimes the SoC name is a worse identifier than the block version, as the block version can change between revisions of the same SoC. As a matter of historical reference, neither SEC versions 2.x nor 3.x (driven by talitos) ever needed CHIP references. Signed-off-by: NKim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com> Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Acked-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录