提交 7cf1aaa2 编写于 作者: A Andi Kleen 提交者: Thomas Gleixner

x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay

__const_udelay is marked inline, and LTO will happily inline it everywhere

Dropping the inline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560        1740864 1499136 17239560        1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764        1736768 1499136 17190668        1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Inlining it has no advantage in general, so its the right thing to do.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171222001821.2157-2-andi@firstfloor.org
上级 81bf665d
......@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
{
unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
int d0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册