提交 7a076e4f 编写于 作者: M Matt Fleming 提交者: Al Viro

ia64: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.

Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures.  In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 60c59751
......@@ -201,13 +201,7 @@ ia64_rt_sigreturn (struct sigscratch *scr)
goto give_sigsegv;
sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
{
current->blocked = set;
recalc_sigpending();
}
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
set_current_blocked(&set);
if (restore_sigcontext(sc, scr))
goto give_sigsegv;
......@@ -427,12 +421,7 @@ handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigse
if (!setup_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, scr))
return 0;
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
block_sigmask(ka, sig);
/*
* Let tracing know that we've done the handler setup.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册