提交 7931d493 编写于 作者: J Jan Beulich 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86/spinlocks: Eliminate TICKET_MASK

The definition of it being questionable already (unnecessarily
including a cast), and it being used in a single place that can
be written shorter without it, remove this #define.

Along the same lines, simplify __ticket_spin_is_locked()'s main
expression, which was the more convoluted way because of needs
that went away with the recent type changes by Jeremy.

This is pure cleanup, no functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F2C06020200007800071066@nat28.tlf.novell.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 9d8e2277
...@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) ...@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{ {
struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets); struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
return !!(tmp.tail ^ tmp.head); return tmp.tail != tmp.head;
} }
static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock) static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{ {
struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets); struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
return ((tmp.tail - tmp.head) & TICKET_MASK) > 1; return (__ticket_t)(tmp.tail - tmp.head) > 1;
} }
#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS #ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
......
...@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ typedef u32 __ticketpair_t; ...@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ typedef u32 __ticketpair_t;
#endif #endif
#define TICKET_SHIFT (sizeof(__ticket_t) * 8) #define TICKET_SHIFT (sizeof(__ticket_t) * 8)
#define TICKET_MASK ((__ticket_t)((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1))
typedef struct arch_spinlock { typedef struct arch_spinlock {
union { union {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册