提交 779d625e 编写于 作者: D Dan Carpenter 提交者: Joseph Qi

iocost: don't nest spin_lock_irq in ioc_weight_write()

commit 41591a51f00d2dc7bb9dc6e9bedf56c5cf6f2392 upstream.

This code causes a static analysis warning:

    block/blk-iocost.c:2113 ioc_weight_write() error: double lock 'irq'

We disable IRQs in blkg_conf_prep() and re-enable them in
blkg_conf_finish().  IRQ disable/enable should not be nested because
that means the IRQs will be enabled at the first unlock instead of the
second one.

Fixes: 7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
上级 573ddb46
......@@ -2178,10 +2178,10 @@ static ssize_t ioc_weight_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
goto einval;
}
spin_lock_irq(&iocg->ioc->lock);
spin_lock(&iocg->ioc->lock);
iocg->cfg_weight = v;
weight_updated(iocg);
spin_unlock_irq(&iocg->ioc->lock);
spin_unlock(&iocg->ioc->lock);
blkg_conf_finish(&ctx);
return nbytes;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册