提交 74ed7e62 编写于 作者: J Joern Engel 提交者: Nicholas Bellinger

target: remove some smp_mb__after_atomic()s

atomic_inc_return() already does an implicit memory barrier and the
second case was moved from an atomic to a plain flag operation.  If a
barrier were needed in the second case, it would have to be smp_mb(),
not a variant optimized away for x86 and other architectures.
Signed-off-by: NJoern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
上级 8f832690
......@@ -1166,7 +1166,6 @@ transport_check_alloc_task_attr(struct se_cmd *cmd)
* Dormant to Active status.
*/
cmd->se_ordered_id = atomic_inc_return(&dev->dev_ordered_id);
smp_mb__after_atomic();
pr_debug("Allocated se_ordered_id: %u for Task Attr: 0x%02x on %s\n",
cmd->se_ordered_id, cmd->sam_task_attr,
dev->transport->name);
......@@ -2896,7 +2895,6 @@ void transport_send_task_abort(struct se_cmd *cmd)
if (cmd->se_tfo->write_pending_status(cmd) != 0) {
cmd->transport_state |= CMD_T_ABORTED;
cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SEND_DELAYED_TAS;
smp_mb__after_atomic();
return;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册